LakemontPark
Veteran Author
Pennsylvania
Posts:279
Points:153,195
Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 16, 2012 5:40:38 PM
and KERO PRICES AS WELL
|
MOREDLEG
Champion Author
Missouri
Posts:2,786
Points:637,485
Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Jan 24, 2012 10:04:28 PM
Not many stations have E85 in NW MO
|
scoutmaster
Champion Author
Pittsburgh
Posts:82,176
Points:3,282,085
Joined:Mar 2003
|
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2011 8:49:20 PM
There is probably minimal need just about everywhere especially due to the recent news.
|
buckeyecountry
Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:8,193
Points:727,905
Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2011 8:11:51 PM
Not much need here in East Central Ohio
|
cbrandonchapman
Rookie Author
Washington
Posts:14
Points:318,730
Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Dec 23, 2011 6:08:25 PM
Bump.
|
cbrandonchapman
Rookie Author
Washington
Posts:14
Points:318,730
Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Dec 21, 2011 10:41:42 AM
I end up writing it in, in the notes. But few people probably see those. I like the idea of showing E85.
|
kwzh
Champion Author
San Jose
Posts:20,795
Points:3,711,890
Joined:Jul 2001
|
Message Posted: Dec 14, 2011 12:18:09 AM
apiergallini writes,
> And why not just allow all four if a station has them?
Since it's currently an exact rectangle -- each station is assumed to be able to potentially report prices for each type of fuel -- adding a new fuel type that's available at one station would expose a box that can be filled in for *any* station. I think that the danger associated with that change outweighs the benefit of including those few stations that have 4 grades of gas. (Generally, Sunoco.) Likewise for ethanol variants, in my opinion.
This suggestion would be worth revisiting if the presentation is changed so that the input field for a station only accepts fuel types that are available there, according to the station's MSL entry. (A feature that we already want because of the diesel situation.)
|
apiergallini
Veteran Author
North Carolina
Posts:389
Points:249,955
Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Dec 13, 2011 9:45:12 PM
I've also seen a few stations that carry four grades of gasoline (87, 89, 91, and 93 octanes, I think). I might be wrong on the exact octane numbers, but my point is that one of those obviously has to be left out under the current system, but which one? And why not just allow all four if a station has them?
|
70351
Rookie Author
Florida
Posts:15
Points:231,550
Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Dec 12, 2011 12:57:43 PM
I wondered the same thing. I list E-85 pricing in the comments section though, which at least gets the info listed for the station. However, I'm sure many people who would look for this fuel are likely to miss the info since it doesn't actually appear inline with the other fuel types. That's the *BAD* thing about not being able to list it where it should be.
Hopefully a category will be created for E-85 for those stations who sell it so it can be updated and noticed by those who use it.
|
buckeyecountry
Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:8,193
Points:727,905
Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Dec 5, 2011 5:45:26 PM
great idea
|
hnofer17
Champion Author
Austin
Posts:5,500
Points:1,030,655
Joined:Feb 2010
|
Message Posted: Oct 11, 2011 12:32:06 AM
I agree, because I saw a few today and couldn't enter them.
|
CampKohler
Champion Author
Sacramento
Posts:9,689
Points:1,585,260
Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Oct 1, 2011 6:17:20 PM
This is a duplicate topic. Please post replies here.
|
buckeyecountry
Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:8,193
Points:727,905
Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 30, 2011 2:40:50 PM
already a topic on this plus you posted twice on yours
|