Rehorsehay

All-Star Author
California
Posts:871 Points:45,925 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 11, 2012 1:17:15 PM
Nice!
|
ahblid

Rookie Author
New York
Posts:4 Points:180 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 11, 2012 8:31:14 AM
KAR120CSII,
Amtrak, being a wholly owned Federal corporation pays no taxes at all.
Unlike CSX which pays plenty of taxes, especially property taxes. Many states have long considered RR's to be cash cows and have imposed some of the highest property taxes around on them.
|
KAR120CSII

Champion Author
Oregon
Posts:3,188 Points:622,545 Joined:Apr 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 11, 2012 12:46:49 AM
Amtrak can't compete with the RR's that pay no taxes -- look at CSX.
|
gasokie

Champion Author
Oklahoma
Posts:3,448 Points:1,326,225 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2012 6:43:25 PM
Amtrak continues to be a whipping boy for the government, the press and the railroads themnselves. It's a shame that Amtrak isn't promoted and made into a decent form of rail transportation. Lord knows the USA needs it.
|
savvygasgirl

Rookie Author
Michigan
Posts:11 Points:2,005 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2012 12:09:53 PM
That's too bad for Amtrak and it's passengers.
|
asirsultana

Rookie Author
Washington
Posts:2 Points:5,320 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2012 11:57:55 AM
I ride the train from state to state as much as possible. The room is great, the scenery is amazing. I hope they get their act together and work out a better method to improve a wonderful mode of travel.
|
Donatelo

Champion Author
Dayton
Posts:1,124 Points:293,545 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2012 10:36:31 AM
yea
|
albert2008

Champion Author
Winnipeg
Posts:7,357 Points:1,481,985 Joined:Sep 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2012 8:05:23 AM
its to bad
|
BJWI

Champion Author
Milwaukee
Posts:6,415 Points:737,300 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2012 12:54:53 AM
I travel by train from Milwaukee to Chicago, but convenient train service does not exist to travel between many cities within the state of Wisconsin.
|
honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:18,632 Points:1,610,495 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 7, 2012 7:46:57 AM
ahblid, you and phreddy are right in that some areas are not served by trains, thus, ppl can't take them.
I disagree w/ phreddy in that those who live in more rural areas would not take the train. I would take public transportation, if I had that option. But there isn't even a bus line here.
|
ahblid

Rookie Author
New York
Posts:4 Points:180 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 9:09:15 PM
clermont40miles,
It's not likely that many travel by train? I don't think so!
Annual ridership on all train types have been increasing for the last 30 years, nearly doubling in fact. Not including Amtrak, which is busy setting its own records for ridership, 30 years ago American's took 2.488 Billion rides on trains. Now, as of last year, American's took 4.6 Billion rides on trains.
The only reason that even more don't travel by train is because there aren't enough trains going enough places to accommodate them.
|
clermont40miles

Champion Author
Cincinnati
Posts:10,583 Points:1,773,845 Joined:Apr 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 7:07:10 PM
Not likely many supporters travel by train. They like the idea more than the reality.
There are many other alternatives that are better for most folks.
Green is red.
|
phreddy

Rookie Author
British Columbia
Posts:19 Points:10,950 Joined:Jul 2003
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 3:12:14 PM
While it may be nice to be able to use public transportation to save on gas, those of us who live in the country don't have the opportunity. I'm not sure we'd use it if we did as we tend to be a fairly independant lot.
|
clpassenubye

Champion Author
Los Angeles
Posts:3,359 Points:755,230 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 3:07:32 PM
that's terrible
|
honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:18,632 Points:1,610,495 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 5:57:11 AM
maybe the government should be subsidizing rail more as it is a more effective means for mass transportation (people or "stuff") esp. when given long distances w/out major interruptions.
|
rternes62

Rookie Author
Michigan
Posts:2 Points:76,340 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 4:23:08 AM
big business telling the government what to do...typical
|
ahblid

Rookie Author
New York
Posts:4 Points:180 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 1:19:11 AM
taximom5IL wrote: "Quite a discrepancy in speeds. I wonder what initially had the speeds rise to 110, and then to such a drastic decline of 25mph."
The way that they wrote things is a bit confusing. Amtrak currently owns about 1/2 of the line through Michigan, the western half. It is on the Amtrak section where they just raised speeds from 95 MPH to 110 MPH.
Norfolk Southern owns the eastern half of the line and it is there where the speeds were dropped because NS isn't properly maintaining the tracks. And as someone else posting earlier hinted at, one does have to wonder if indeed this is a tactic designed to speed up closing the deal that the State of Michigan just inked with NS to buy the line.
Once Michigan owns that half of the line, work will begin to fix any remaining problems and to start working towards 110 MPH speeds for that half.
|
ahblid

Rookie Author
New York
Posts:4 Points:180 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2012 1:13:31 AM
Tekkie wrote: "Does this mean we won't have to subsidize Amcrack so much?"
We don't subsidize Amtrak very much at all, especially when compared to other forms of travel like say the car.
According to the Taxpayer's Receipt for 2009, a married couple with 2 kids and $80K in income paid $3.83 towards Amtrak via their Federal income tax. That same couple paid $110.06 towards the highways via their income tax. That's on top of what they paid via gas taxes, state taxes, other fees, and property taxes for our roads & highways.
A retired couple with $100K in income paid $3.11 towards Amtrak and $89.38 towards the highways, even if they can no longer drive a car, much less own one.
|
Reishman

Veteran Author
Illinois
Posts:384 Points:517,365 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2012 10:26:21 PM
I dn't trust railroads.
|
roadrunnin

Champion Author
Richmond
Posts:1,760 Points:566,955 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2012 9:45:40 AM
If they tried that on the car highways drivers would riot.
|
honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:18,632 Points:1,610,495 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2012 5:57:45 AM
funny how in Europe we see rail being a good part of the public transportation system. Esp. high speed trains like the TGV. Here? companies try to kill each other.
|
KAR120CSII

Champion Author
Oregon
Posts:3,188 Points:622,545 Joined:Apr 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2012 2:15:04 AM
Good post -- private railroads go on the public dole -- CSX paid no taxes for years -- and stiffle Amtrak.
|
sparky808

Champion Author
Honolulu
Posts:3,008 Points:599,685 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 4, 2012 1:14:47 PM
Thank you for posting.
|
gasokie

Champion Author
Oklahoma
Posts:3,448 Points:1,326,225 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 4, 2012 12:19:20 PM
The railroads have been a boil on the backside of humanity since their inception back in the 1800s. But they are necessary and desirable ways to move both freight and people. I don't have an answer but something needs to be done..especially about passenger train service. Amtrak will never compete with these low speeds.
In the early part of the 1900s passenger trains scooted along at speeds from 85 to over 100MPH. Now, for instance, the Heartland Flyer from Ft. Worth to OKC is harassed with being switched to a siding and speed limits at 55MPH where the former speeds averaged 80 to 90MPH. Burlington uses those lines to haul freight and a lot of coal at 35 MPH or less.
|
fuel2use

Champion Author
Seattle
Posts:3,493 Points:734,300 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 4, 2012 9:58:15 AM
Tough situation.
|
gawxnative

All-Star Author
Atlanta
Posts:510 Points:229,865 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 4, 2012 8:17:29 AM
Frieght traffic pays the bills
|
honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:18,632 Points:1,610,495 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 4, 2012 6:04:24 AM
as long as NS is allowed to do it, they will continue to do so in other places. That's the problem when you don't own the tracks.
|
jetskijerry

Champion Author
North Carolina
Posts:3,906 Points:774,220 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 4, 2012 12:06:41 AM
Go back to handcars.
|
CdnLynx

Champion Author
Ontario
Posts:1,024 Points:524,960 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 11:53:24 PM
Sorry folks on my post re: speed Not sure what I did wrong but it did not come out properly! MeaCulpa!
|
CdnLynx

Champion Author
Ontario
Posts:1,024 Points:524,960 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 11:48:23 PM
March 16, 2012 Norfolk Southern slows train speeds between Dearborn and Kalamazoo NORFOLK, VA. - Effective March 15, 2012, Norfolk Southern lowered the railroad operating speed limits on certain sections of the Michigan Line between Dearborn and Kalamazoo that handle both Amtrak’s passenger service and Norfolk Southern’s freight service. These lower speed limits have been imposed to reflect the maximum safe operating speeds for the line, given the line’s condition. Safety is of paramount importance in both passenger and freight rail operations. The reduction in railroad operating speed limits both has been anticipated over time and is in conformance with existing agreements between Norfolk Southern and Amtrak. Other portions of the Michigan mainline experienced similar reductions in railroad operating speed limits in 2011. Some of those 2011 speed reductions were later eliminated as the result of work funded by Michigan DOT. The Michigan Line is currently the subject of an existing agreement that anticipates the acquisition of the rail line by Michigan, and the subsequent rehabilitation of the line to handle maximum authorized speeds of up to 110 mph for passenger trains. That transaction is expected to be completed later this year, pending federal regulatory review. “Until ownership of the Michigan Line is transferred, Norfolk Southern is willing to perform work on the line on behalf of Amtrak or Michigan DOT to address any passenger operating concerns,” said John V. Edwards, Norfolk Southern’s general director passenger policy. “This work is not necessary to provide freight service, but if the passenger service providers want to provide the necessary funding, we will do it."
[Edited by: CdnLynx at 4/3/2012 11:49:59 PM EST]
|
KAR120CSII

Champion Author
Oregon
Posts:3,188 Points:622,545 Joined:Apr 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 10:32:22 PM
Thanks DickAAA -- you're right. The railroads have been on the public dole for years -- but if they can screw Amtrak they'll do it.
|
taximom5IL

Rookie Author
Champaign
Posts:9 Points:65,805 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 10:20:51 PM
Quite a discrepancy in speeds. I wonder what initially had the speeds rise to 110, and then to such a drastic decline of 25mph. Surely they've done studies to see which speed(s) would be more appropriate along these treks of railroad that Amtrak will be utilizing. I believe that when consumers hear the name Amtrak, they think fast! Not 5mph faster than a school zone.
|
Sparky19038

Champion Author
Philadelphia
Posts:2,048 Points:580,140 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 4:53:27 PM
Interesting: "The slow orders from NS come while it is negotiating to complete the sale of the line to the State of Michigan."
There aren't enough details regarding the technical reasons for the slow order, but the cynic in me immediately wonders if this is a negotiating tactic.
|
gknee09

All-Star Author
Philadelphia
Posts:985 Points:823,765 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 3:56:48 PM
that stinks for Amtrak and passengers
|
kelly1016

Champion Author
Victoria
Posts:1,953 Points:352,940 Joined:Oct 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 3:06:44 PM
Trians are a much better alternative to air planes for mid distance travel. This is a short term maintainance problem. Train travel will continue to improve and take more frieght
|
WhiteTreeIndian

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:5,659 Points:1,123,085 Joined:Dec 2009
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:37:15 PM
Hopefully they will work out a better plan.
|
DickAAA

Champion Author
St. Louis
Posts:2,266 Points:1,362,685 Joined:Jan 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:20:41 PM
The American tax payer just spent a large sum of money to improve NS trackage so the 100 MPH Amtrack trains could hurry between Chicago and Detroit. Why are they allowed to slow down the trains now????
|
adgam

Champion Author
Orange County
Posts:2,264 Points:501,020 Joined:Nov 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:15:34 PM
ok
|
traumer

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:5,379 Points:1,339,425 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:15:15 PM
The railroad company it seems is trying to kill off Amtrak.
|
CORKYWC

All-Star Author
Chicago
Posts:551 Points:2,117,870 Joined:Apr 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:14:52 PM
I am not surprise at good service.
|
ftsgt

Champion Author
Illinois
Posts:13,052 Points:2,484,520 Joined:Dec 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:13:12 PM
high speed rail not off to a good start
|
humancry

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:4,618 Points:1,002,455 Joined:Nov 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:10:35 PM
Its always got something to do with money somewhere.
|
TustinDad

Champion Author
Orange County
Posts:4,300 Points:908,540 Joined:Feb 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:09:01 PM
dacofa wrote: "Behind closed door politics by the idiot in the WH."
If you could just explain your warped sense of "logic" you used when you came up with this comment, I would be very glad to listen.
|
mediccoy

Champion Author
North Carolina
Posts:11,920 Points:2,313,055 Joined:May 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:08:41 PM
To travel any great distance, it's much cheaper to fly than spend days on a train. But I do love riding them on short trips when I can. That includes Tweetsie railroad in Blowing Rock NC too!
|
rbrowdersr

Champion Author
Detroit
Posts:5,726 Points:1,819,960 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:05:53 PM
Hope this delay ends soon.
|
W5IEM

Veteran Author
Lexington
Posts:265 Points:359,595 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:05:13 PM
Unfortunately in my area rail is not an option...
|
dacofa

Champion Author
Nevada
Posts:5,375 Points:1,150,610 Joined:Jan 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:01:15 PM
Behind closed door politics by the idiot in the WH.
|
julius1st4

Champion Author
Ontario
Posts:4,216 Points:1,191,575 Joined:Jul 2003
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 2:01:01 PM
I commented yesterday.
|
colaguy

Champion Author
Columbia
Posts:3,176 Points:1,008,950 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 1:59:47 PM
not good
|
hibsaw

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:8,047 Points:1,682,940 Joined:Feb 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2012 1:59:41 PM
I would much rather be delayed 45 minutes than derail at a high speed on a stretch of track that is being upgtaded.
|