grandmacbc

Champion Author
Buffalo
Posts:6,675 Points:1,451,500 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 7:32:06 AM
It's more dangerous to park a sedan next an SUV or Van because you can't see around them and vehicles passing you in parking lots can't see you because your vehicle is shorter than ones next to you! Don't see where backup cameras would help this. Should be areas reserved for sedans in parking lots like in parking ramps.
|
Ziggy1962

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:6,116 Points:1,839,360 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 6:03:51 AM
No.
|
pkhdonovan

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:12,151 Points:2,733,505 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 5:05:04 AM
no
|
NavyStore

Champion Author
Seattle
Posts:3,874 Points:2,100,385 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 2:16:01 AM
To many people back up and don't look where they are going, causing lots of accidents.
|
cssco

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:7,467 Points:1,779,225 Joined:Feb 2006
|
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 1:54:20 AM
Way too costly.
|
dongo50

Champion Author
West Virginia
Posts:14,878 Points:2,407,745 Joined:Jul 2006
|
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 12:32:46 AM
no
|
ranger1169

Champion Author
Harrisburg
Posts:3,120 Points:539,790 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 12:26:57 AM
no
|
rescuer

Veteran Author
Las Vegas
Posts:324 Points:61,495 Joined:Nov 2005
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:40:44 PM
Get the drunks off the road then talk to me about paying for another expense to save .0002 lives per year.
|
02goldwing

Rookie Author
Illinois
Posts:79 Points:629,530 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:29:13 PM
G.O.A.L
Get Out And Look!
|
RxHugh

Champion Author
Greensboro
Posts:7,749 Points:1,602,635 Joined:Feb 2003
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:19:43 PM
y
|
akamaikiwi

Rookie Author
New York
Posts:12 Points:29,125 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 9:53:28 PM
No, the backup sensor is sufficient. Perhaps the backup sensor should be standard on all cars.
|
Bonanza

Champion Author
Boston
Posts:12,260 Points:2,579,680 Joined:Jun 2004
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 9:03:21 PM
Yes
|
Wingking32

Rookie Author
South Carolina
Posts:1 Points:8,995 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:43:47 PM
Sorry Big Blue but I'm far from lazy. Had it not been for the one on my car a 3 yr old precious little girl would likely been a fatality when she darted out from behind the van parked beside me in a local Target parking lot. For safety, make them mandatory and remove the cd/DVD to offset the cost.
|
BAJALRRP

All-Star Author
Tacoma
Posts:550 Points:1,290,465 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:38:40 PM
It should NOT be mandated.
|
skanytank

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:1,391 Points:587,800 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:26:53 PM
it's a decent option but not sure it must be mandated, like others said, if you want it then pay for it, simple enough...
|
ladymoondance

Rookie Author
Raleigh
Posts:54 Points:284,260 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:14:30 PM
Should NOT be mandatory.
|
wimpy

Rookie Author
Michigan
Posts:1 Points:370 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:13:14 PM
yes, backup cameras should be mandatory, its a safety issues.
|
BigBlue5

All-Star Author
Spokane
Posts:775 Points:152,005 Joined:Apr 2010
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 4:44:42 PM
No, Putting backup cameras in all vehicles is a waste of money. They go against what we learned in drivers school - Turn your head and look! What's wrong with that. Cameras are for lazy people.
|
chui

Champion Author
Dallas
Posts:2,932 Points:2,389,055 Joined:Sep 2004
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 4:38:00 PM
yes............
|
AlTraveler

All-Star Author
Alabama
Posts:626 Points:1,231,045 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:18:10 PM
yes
|
Maka1

Rookie Author
Honolulu
Posts:4 Points:199,530 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:13:53 PM
no
|
nordlead

Veteran Author
Syracuse
Posts:300 Points:122,890 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:05:45 PM
no, since they are 2D displays. You can't see how far away whatever it is that you are going to run over, only that it is there. They will also be low resolution. Both of those factors make human eyes looking out the rear window vastly superior. We should pass a law that says you have to look out the rear window instead.
|
Terdburner

Champion Author
Idaho
Posts:5,398 Points:167,530 Joined:Nov 2010
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 2:45:30 PM
Mandatory. Now. My beaver insists only those who disagree will have to pay for it.
|
mkohly

Veteran Author
Chicago
Posts:286 Points:27,530 Joined:Sep 2009
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 2:33:25 PM
Should NOT be mandatory!
If you need it, pay for the option, but don't force everyone to buy something they don't need.
I almost never use reverse: I get to work while the parking lot is empty and call always drive into my spot, then drive out while going forward on the way home. The house has a circular drive-way so no need to ever go backwards.
|
Alturki83

Rookie Author
San Diego
Posts:1 Points:2,170 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 1:58:51 PM
yes, it is easier and saver than not to have one.
|
Pspeed

Champion Author
Baltimore
Posts:7,277 Points:955,970 Joined:Jun 2007
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 1:39:24 PM
Yes, definitely. Since I only drive backwards anyway. Now I won't have to turn by head.
|
keo

Champion Author
Colorado
Posts:10,397 Points:2,062,540 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 1:24:08 PM
no
|
ricebike

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:10,118 Points:1,871,825 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 12:41:17 PM
as a fedex driver, it's a very good tool for safety
i saw a kid jump on the back bumper step when I started the van; scanned all mirrors and saw him on the camera... immediately i opened the back door and scared him off :P
|
leveit2clever

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:7,246 Points:451,635 Joined:May 2009
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 12:08:03 PM
Yup. And jumper rods with jato assist underneath the car for unexpected crevasses. And air tight seals with a pop-up snorkel so you can drive underwater.
|
elmo_good

Rookie Author
Wilmington
Posts:1 Points:120 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:46:19 AM
Cameras no, ultrasonic detectors are part of many new cars, if you want protection there are radar units available. More electronic gadgets to distract drivers. from the ad above: Rear-View Camera Kits $79.99 LCD Monitor & Color Backup. System w/Nightvision. Order Online! If you feel the need buy one but as for me no. how many people are going to be injured due to watching the camera instead of paying attention to the act of driving? What next mandate Heads Up Displays? I love the mandated air pressure monitors, like you don't know when your tires are low or flat, duh. Get out and inspect your car. Walk around it and look at it for those that don't have a clue.
Like the man said "Common sense is so uncommon."
elmo_good
|
oolalaa

Rookie Author
San Jose
Posts:6 Points:91,695 Joined:Jan 2002
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:25:18 AM
No, because it adds cost and it's hard to use. You can't use it to steer in my experience so you're looking at your mirrors, not the camera. The alarms are better becuse you hear the obstruction (pole, pet, child) and can stop before you hit.
|
RevDrCBJ

Veteran Author
Ann Arbor
Posts:385 Points:193,100 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:20:00 AM
Should be optional equipment
|
HFAJR0034

Champion Author
New Mexico
Posts:6,611 Points:1,195,460 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:15:58 AM
yes
|
Lengas

Champion Author
Gary
Posts:13,704 Points:2,745,700 Joined:Nov 2004
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:08:49 AM
Yes definitely
|
dwgmeg

Rookie Author
Ontario
Posts:1 Points:3,980 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:55:30 AM
i had back up alarms on my van when i purchased it and decided to put a back-upcamera on my truck it was a god send as it help helped on many occasions where i could of hurt somebody or animal many times
|
N9HVP

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:11,853 Points:2,499,315 Joined:Sep 2004
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:32:36 AM
Yes.
|
Kana

All-Star Author
New York
Posts:508 Points:163,220 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 9:41:38 AM
Mandatory b|u cameras, No. many of the available options on today's vehicle are for for the occupants comfort or convenience. These options also add to the price of the vehicle. B\u camera's are a benefit on some larger vehicle such as mini vans.
B\u alarms are an effective warning device and less expensive than cameras. When you learn to drive you are taught to make sure the area is clear\unobstructed before backing-up. Just the same as your supposed to check your mirrors and use turn signals before changing lanes.
If your vehicle is equipped with a b\u camera or blind spot monitors, etc. and you still have an accident. Are you more liable for failing to use the devices?
|
AlTraveler

All-Star Author
Alabama
Posts:626 Points:1,231,045 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:57:59 AM
yes
|
OKRifle

Champion Author
Oklahoma City
Posts:10,588 Points:1,838,960 Joined:Oct 2007
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:50:35 AM
No
|
SSchmidty

Champion Author
Illinois
Posts:9,492 Points:1,804,455 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:24:58 AM
It's all about more safety not less!
|
BaLakov100

Rookie Author
Missouri
Posts:6 Points:554,000 Joined:Oct 2004
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:47:52 AM
No
|
TxJeans

Champion Author
Tampa
Posts:3,777 Points:387,340 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:42:36 AM
Nope, not mandatory. They may be nice options and market will drive price and they will likely be standard in the future. For those that think these will save lives, it isn't that simple. Too many electronics and distractions already. There are too many that are just going around in a fog and will stare blankly at the screen and ignore other sensory input around them. A camera takes active utilization by the person, just like walking around their car and using their mirrors. You cannot legislate away stupidity or accidents.
Back up sensors would do more and may break through the fog of today's distracted drivers.
Parents need to also take more responsibility with their kids. Period. Folks keep talking about the 22 month in FL. Well, that accident might have happened even with a camera - a kid running behind a car can happen too fast for someone to respond to regardless of a camera. That mother should have had that 22 month old firmly in tow. She was distracted and went back to her car letting the kid wander off in a busy parking lot.
BUC (at the level that would be mandated) would not be of great quality. They do not have good depth of view, and do not cover all "potential" risks of backing up. Folks will rely on them rather than good common sense and their full set of senses as they focus on a screen INSIDE their car and not see the big picture.
They are a tool that can be used to help, or a tool that can be used improperly and add more risk. Leave them to those that want to pay for them, and hopefully, they will be the ones to use them properly.
|
ranger1169

Champion Author
Harrisburg
Posts:3,120 Points:539,790 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:40:25 AM
no
|
dongo50

Champion Author
West Virginia
Posts:14,878 Points:2,407,745 Joined:Jul 2006
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:25:56 AM
no
|
cigarman409

Champion Author
Massachusetts
Posts:4,581 Points:1,855,310 Joined:Jul 2007
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:23:19 AM
optional only
|
cigarman409

Champion Author
Massachusetts
Posts:4,581 Points:1,855,310 Joined:Jul 2007
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:22:51 AM
no
|
Ziggy1962

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:6,116 Points:1,839,360 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 5:04:49 AM
No.
|
pkhdonovan

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:12,151 Points:2,733,505 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 5:04:42 AM
no
|
ranger1169

Champion Author
Harrisburg
Posts:3,120 Points:539,790 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 12:38:00 AM
no
|
tc17a

Rookie Author
South Carolina
Posts:56 Points:383,095 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 12:15:20 AM
No
|
naw

Champion Author
Denver
Posts:3,610 Points:490,715 Joined:Oct 2006
|
Message Posted: May 3, 2012 11:05:15 PM
Yes. How many times do you hear on your local news that someone had backed over a toddler and said "I didn't know he/she was there!"
|
JABiii

Rookie Author
Shreveport
Posts:1 Points:22,045 Joined:Jun 2006
|
Message Posted: May 3, 2012 10:32:13 PM
The only time rear view cameras should be required is when the driver's view is consistently blocked by the structure of the vehicle. Ultrasonic proximity alarms such as on many minivans and SUVs would provide adequate protection for the alert driver from items in the pathway of the vehicle.
|