apiergallini

Veteran Author
North Carolina
Posts:389 Points:249,955 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 11:58:28 PM
@aquarinut
You're right. Clearly, I managed to comment on the substance of your second paragraph without actually reading it. That makes perfect sense.
The data IS accurate, even when you hit a pothole, etc. The point is that when your wheel is spinning at 100 MPH, it's important to know whether you had traction on the road, lost traction on the road, or weren't even touching the road. That doesn't mean the data is invalid - it means it's been taken out of context.
@ExplorerWA
The black boxes, as explained, only track wheel, engine, and brake information (maybe a couple other things). There is currently no GPS, so it has no idea where you are, or where you're going. This is like saying that your speedometer, tachometer, and brakes know where you are and where you're going. All the black boxes would do is record things you car already "knows."
Regarding who owns the data, I'm sure you do. You also own the data on your computer, too. But that doesn't mean that if you use your computer to commit a crime that the police can't get a warrant to access your data. Likewise, when you're in an accident, you can either give police access to your data, or they can probably get a warrant to take it. There's really no difference. Also, unless you're in an accident, there's no data to take or use, so you're actually protected better by the black box than you are with your computer, which keeps records of everything, regardless of whether you commit a crime.
@mwc407
You'd like to think so, but I'd be willing to bet that at least a few of them would sacrifice that knowledge.
@MusicalMan7
I agree, but having the black box in the car doesn't automatically give anyone access to it - they still need either your permission, or a warrant.
@BuckyTJones
Agreed. Sometimes, they're nobody's fault. Sometimes, they're everybody's fault. Sometimes, they're only one person's fault. But what's the harm in letting the police and insurance companies figure out which is correct?
As far as I know, the insurance company of the at-fault driver pays for the accident, assuming he's insured. That wouldn't change by being able to tell more easily who was at fault. If you're an average driver, you'll be at fault as often as not. If you're a good driver, you'll benefit, because you'll be able to show more easily you weren't at fault. If you're a bad driver, then you'll suffer, which will give you the incentive to either drive more carefully, or you'll price yourself out of insurance.
[Edited by: apiergallini at 5/1/2012 12:02:12 AM EST]
|
sjf238

Champion Author
Philadelphia
Posts:1,215 Points:648,705 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 4:39:23 PM
Interesting.
|
BuckyTJones

Champion Author
Salt Lake City
Posts:4,932 Points:967,950 Joined:Mar 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 10:21:10 AM
So whats the point? Does this give a reason for the insurance companies not to pay? I really feel that most of the time, accidents are just that, accidents. I don't think some one wakes up and says, who's day besides my own can I ruin.
|
Penny_Pincher

Veteran Author
Columbus
Posts:435 Points:22,695 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:44:48 AM
So, the big news is that people can't lie anymore? I'm not sure what to think of that.
|
jorobins538

Champion Author
Chicago
Posts:4,742 Points:643,570 Joined:Sep 2009
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:18:49 AM
ok
|
bicycle1966

All-Star Author
Akron
Posts:606 Points:414,360 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:14:57 AM
the data that could be gotten could be very useful -- but the question is: Useful to whom? and To What End?
Not sure how I feel about this.
|
jeffbone

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:1,403 Points:413,875 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:09:46 AM
More government intrustion.
Help stop this crap: http://www.motorists.org/
[Edited by: jeffbone at 4/30/2012 9:10:03 AM EST]
|
the1roadhog

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:9,949 Points:2,079,755 Joined:Jun 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:03:58 AM
About one's personal freedoms????
|
BEGTWO

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:2,072 Points:749,890 Joined:Sep 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:53:08 AM
BIG Brother is always watching!!!
|
alex395

Champion Author
Louisville
Posts:2,082 Points:280,255 Joined:Jan 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:18:05 AM
Net equivalent of being watched all the time. What is next cameras in the bathroom so they can make sure we don't excessively pollute.
|
jrs4125

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:2,888 Points:617,495 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:06:51 AM
Big brother knows.
|
bondo

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:3,636 Points:788,185 Joined:May 2001
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:36:48 AM
Big brother.
|
gandalfthegrey1

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,184 Points:384,785 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:34:00 AM
Given that we got along fine w/o these for a century, do we really ANOTHER invasion of privacy so the insurance companies can make more money? Does anyone believe insurance companies are any better than big oil? They're not.
|
TerrySawchuk

All-Star Author
British Columbia
Posts:850 Points:305,395 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:17:19 AM
I like it!
|
danny999

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:8,853 Points:1,664,810 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 6:23:11 AM
The black box is needed to save lives,like cameras at red lights.Some one/something has to control the speed freaks who don't care about anyone else.
|
JohnofGB

Champion Author
Flint
Posts:5,556 Points:1,122,920 Joined:Feb 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 6:22:19 AM
These boxes have been around for years. And now they are big concern????
|
Wally3023

Champion Author
Pennsylvania
Posts:2,111 Points:556,100 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 6:20:50 AM
Big brother is coming to a car near you
|
gabisgram

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:2,316 Points:936,050 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 5:53:14 AM
We just don't trust each other.
|
2bigtanks

All-Star Author
Akron
Posts:772 Points:371,610 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 3:28:10 AM
New toys for everyone!
|
Amplion

Champion Author
Oregon
Posts:6,916 Points:1,891,785 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 3:10:44 AM
BIG BROTHER & STATE FARM ARE WATCHING YOU !!!!
|
Pozole

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:9,754 Points:1,620,270 Joined:Mar 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 2:54:21 AM
...I'm sure this is a mandate of the insurance lobby...we are controlled by big biz...
|
tessnlu

Champion Author
Missouri
Posts:24,536 Points:1,133,940 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 2:48:30 AM
This is a good idea. People are not honest when it comes to their mistakes. It's always someone else's fault. This will make the truth come out!
|
MusicalMan7

All-Star Author
Ohio
Posts:597 Points:93,430 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 2:30:39 AM
@BJWI - That is a bit naïve and oversimplified. I assure you that you break laws every single day that you don't even know exist. It's sort of like the argument from the cops, "If you have nothing to hide, what's the harm in consenting to a search of your trunk?" Because it's still Free America last I checked and I have a Fourth Amendment right to keep you from being snoopy, that's the harm. Same here. Just because a thing CAN be done and seems harmless doesn't mean it ought.
|
SBlouch

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:8,828 Points:1,883,375 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 1:35:54 AM
So, I guess the best thing to do is drive the speed limit. Black boxes have been used by lawyers since they were first put in a few select cars. Now they are in all vehicles and lawyers just love them if the a representing the client who is suing the person who caused the crash.
|
BJWI

Champion Author
Milwaukee
Posts:6,546 Points:762,015 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 1:22:04 AM
Not too concerned about it - it is funny, when you don't break the law, you really don't worry about these kinds of things.
|
MN1

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:3,489 Points:676,940 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 1:13:20 AM
Big Brother is watching and the lawyers LOVE it.
|
alterman156

Champion Author
New York
Posts:7,620 Points:1,583,275 Joined:Dec 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 1:02:31 AM
The black box could tell police officers otherwise.
|
Point__man

Champion Author
Raleigh
Posts:4,467 Points:903,445 Joined:Oct 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 12:44:43 AM
insurance companies and lawyers will love these new toys ;)
|
Michael29644

Champion Author
Greenville
Posts:5,134 Points:869,025 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 12:36:38 AM
"These boxes track everything. Where your are, where your going and who owns the data? How will it be used?"
ExplorerWA,
They do NOT track where you are, or where you are going. Please stop spreading disinformation.
"Is lying to a police officer a crime?"
buckets42,
In my state, generally no. The only exceptions I can think of are falsely reporting a crime and falsely identifying yourself to an officer when asked.
|
northeast2

Champion Author
New York
Posts:3,849 Points:1,007,200 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 12:34:27 AM
"Getting the data sometimes can be a hassle. A company called Bosch is the only one that sells the hardware and software that allow investigators to download the data, and even then, only from certain automakers. If it’s not available, investigators have to get a warrant and go through the manufacturer’s legal department."
Aww, aren't the Fourth and Fifth Amendments pains in the neck?
|
megadiesellv

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:1,474 Points:503,585 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 12:30:12 AM
Soon we'll have to ride bicyles.
|
gus8441

Champion Author
Baltimore
Posts:2,239 Points:468,250 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 12:16:33 AM
agree with davenles
|
cheapchickKY

Champion Author
Lexington
Posts:4,154 Points:823,015 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 12:13:42 AM
And right after checking the black box cell phones need to be checked.
Black boxes have been used in aviation for years.
|
anascom

Champion Author
Hamilton
Posts:1,593 Points:556,690 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 12:09:16 AM
might violate privacy policies!
|
feldos

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:2,640 Points:562,650 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 11:41:48 PM
davenles...you are correct...a very slippery slope
|
mwc407

Champion Author
North Carolina
Posts:1,095 Points:574,885 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 11:41:43 PM
It's logical (with modern electronics) that your car could record data in the event of an accident. While some people may oppose the use of the technology / data, I bet they would change their mind if a loved one were seriously injured or killed in a auto accident and the black box helped determine who was truly at fault in the accident.
|
davenles

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:3,331 Points:744,635 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 11:24:38 PM
A slippery slope.
|
dorisntx

Champion Author
Fort Worth
Posts:2,079 Points:664,155 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 11:10:40 PM
no black boxes.
|
leraar2

Champion Author
Massachusetts
Posts:3,894 Points:813,430 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 11:02:38 PM
ban black boxes.
|
ExplorerWA

Champion Author
Washington
Posts:4,230 Points:823,000 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 10:45:50 PM
These boxes track everything. Where your are, where your going and who owns the data? How will it be used?
|
aquarinut

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:1,630 Points:443,670 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 10:23:20 PM
@apiergallini
Quite obviously didn't read second para.
Objective data: Make the car manufactures PROVE that their data is valid when hitting a pothole, garbage, rock on road, deer, something thrown from pedestrian overpass, black ice, avalanche, mudslide, sudden flood, hurricane, earthquake or even a mud puddle.
Until then.... eye witness' no matter how they see things, are the data "on the ground".
Too many people look to computers, TV and movies to see how forensics are done. Give it a try... talk to ANY emergency responder about how accurate the media is on processing "hard" on scene evidence...
@StArrow68
IPhone for accuracy???? LOL!!!!
|
Wanda127

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:2,565 Points:939,600 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 10:14:28 PM
Accident data records wouldn't be so bad but several Insurance co.'s & the government want to do more. They want to put GPS's with speed & mileage tracking devices on your cars & will give you 5% disc. to add it to your car. The government I'm sure will do more with it if Obama has his way.
[Edited by: Wanda127 at 4/29/2012 10:15:41 PM EST]
|
petrpuck

All-Star Author
Hamilton
Posts:569 Points:438,635 Joined:Nov 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 10:11:24 PM
Who da thunk
|
ToolinIt

Champion Author
Colorado
Posts:1,805 Points:910,385 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:46:55 PM
Backwoods - a true statement that you posted. Sad, but true.
|
Cakes77

Champion Author
Harrisburg
Posts:5,280 Points:1,676,320 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:41:02 PM
Nice article.
|
esq262

Champion Author
Asheville
Posts:2,998 Points:672,790 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:27:27 PM
Too much.
|
PDQBlues

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:7,204 Points:1,474,075 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:16:33 PM
The Supreme Court recently ruled that you can be strip searched simply for being arrested on a suspicion. Never mind about conviction, you are now guilty before proven innocent. What's a black box in your car compared to a strip search for privacy?
|
Pete12

Champion Author
Albany
Posts:4,915 Points:1,658,945 Joined:Nov 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:07:28 PM
Do like you are supposed to do and you won't have a problem.
|
apiergallini

Veteran Author
North Carolina
Posts:389 Points:249,955 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:06:41 PM
@tnfran @hoosierva
When you're driving a vehicle on a public roadway, and are in an accident, you should have no expectation of privacy.
@gizbo123
Recording data from a few seconds before and after an accident is nowhere near being in the same ballpark as putting cameras in our homes. You have no expectation of privacy in public. People can record you, take your picture, note that you were there, etc. As it is, red light cameras only take your picture if they detect you ran the light. But there wouldn't be anything illegal if they took everyone's picture, as long as citations were only issued to those who actually ran the light.
@APlus @playtimeCLE
There is no right to privacy. It's not in the Constitution, and it's not in any statutes that I'm aware of. As best I know, it was created in Roe v. Wade.@Van_Halen
What are you talking about? Both lawyers get to see the same data, and both have the opportunity to spin it in their favor. That means that your lawyer can use the data to help you. You're against that?
And obviously, the scenario you gave is possible, that you were hit before you could apply the brakes. So what? How does that go against installing data recorders? You could say the same thing in court 40 years ago - the lack of skid marks will show that you didn't apply your brakes.
Also, an accelerometer won't tell how fast you were going - only whether and how fast you were speeding up or slowing down. Nobody ever said that the wheel speed, engine speed, etc., would be used to determine you actual traveling speed. They can be used for other reasons, though - to show you accelerated into the accident, for instance. Maybe that you lost traction. Maybe that you jerked the wheel after being hit, not before you were hit, like you said.
@buckets42
I think it depends on the circumstances. In general, you're allowed to lie to anyone, including police, though that could implicate crimes like fraud, false pretenses, etc., depending on the circumstances of the lie(s). I think, but am not sure, that it's a crime to make a false official statement to a police officer, which would include when he's conducting an investigation. It's absolutely a crime to lie under oath in court. Even if it's not a crime to lie to police, you still probably don't want to do that, because you'll either have to perjure yourself in order to maintain your story in court, or you'll have to admit that you lied, which will hurt your credibility, and ultimately, perhaps, your case. Once you've been shown in court to have lied about something, you'll be fighting an uphill battle to get anyone to believe anything else you said that would help your case.
@aquarinut
No they wouldn't. They can use the GPS data showing you were at place X at time Y if they want. But you can always rebut that by showing that that model is inaccurate, your particular unit is inaccurate, the location gets poor reception, etc. There aren't strict standards for many things in law.
But why would you say the objective data - brakes, tire pressure, etc. - should be left out and we should only rely on witnesses? Witnesses are notoriously bad at recalling people and events. Besides, if the data exists, it can be subpoenaed, whether you say that you own the data in your car, or the manufacturer does, or whatever. Like you said about GPS, this data only reports the truth. There may certainly be other factors that are necessary to get the full picture (e.g. tires not making contact with the road), but the data doesn't lie - it just may need to be put in context.
@doeslayersr
Agreed, completely.
|
BackwoodsPundit

Champion Author
Richmond
Posts:5,207 Points:1,026,740 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 8:59:36 PM
The police are being transformed from a group designed to protect and defend to becoming the front lines of a surveillance police state. We are not there, but we are well on the road.
It is very sad. One can only be thankful that fascist and communist regimes of the past didn't have such technology at their fingertips. Our children and grandchildren won't be as fortunate.
|