Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    12:53 AM

GasBuddy News Article

58
votes
Pipeline Inspector-Turned Whistleblower Calls Keystone XL a Potential “Disaster”

ThinkProgress -- After forcing a White House decision on the Keystone XL pipeline, Republicans are being lambasted for undercutting the Federal environmental review process.

Now a whistleblower is claiming the company overseeing the development of the project, TransCanada, also has a track record of undercutting quality at the expense of the environment — further calling into question the decision by Congress to prevent a new Federal Environmental Impact Study.

Mike Klink is a former inspector for Bechtel, one of the major contractors working on TransCanada’s original Keystone pipeline. Instead of actually addressing problems, Klink claims he was fired by Bechtel in retaliation. He filed a complaint with the Department of Labor in March 2010.

As an inspector, my job was to monitor construction of


Read the Full Article

Submitted Feb 10, 2012 By: Martinman
Category: Daily News Article Discussions > Topics Add to favorite topics  
Author Topic: Pipeline Inspector-Turned Whistleblower Calls Keystone XL a Potential “Disaster” Post a Reply Back to Topics
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
honda0105
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:15,984
Points:1,249,100
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Feb 14, 2012 6:14:22 AM

I've always been wary of TransCanada's heavy push. Glad to hear the my suspicions were right from the start.
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:12,522
Points:1,741,020
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 13, 2012 4:35:10 PM

There is a GB member, who posted very early in the discussion (his replies have since been bounced-off), he knew Mike Klink, and had no reason to believe that what Klink had written, was not true.

[Edited by: Martinman at 2/13/2012 4:36:32 PM EST]
Profile Pic
honda0105
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:15,984
Points:1,249,100
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Feb 13, 2012 6:03:51 AM

maybe all those who clamor for "build it yesterday" will take some notes. Of course, there's always the "he did it b/c he wanted to retaliate against the company."
Just funny how there's an attempt to fast track this pipeline and get it through under the big radar.
Profile Pic
KAR120CSII
Champion Author Oregon

Posts:1,960
Points:330,050
Joined:Apr 2010
Message Posted: Feb 12, 2012 2:34:49 AM

Since the regulators and inspectors have been cut back these past 30 years it's left to the whistleblowers -- the American way.
Profile Pic
niceguytx
Champion Author Houston

Posts:11,932
Points:2,356,940
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 10:52:52 AM

Not a good endorsement
Profile Pic
pbug101
All-Star Author Georgia

Posts:812
Points:239,020
Joined:Aug 2011
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 8:59:09 AM

ok
Profile Pic
tomok
Champion Author Portland

Posts:26,097
Points:1,985,410
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 3:12:22 AM

Some say it’s bad to build the pipeline and risk the environment, others say it’s good for the sale of oil, more jobs and the more personal income it will provide.
Big oil will sell fuel and natural gas on the world market for higher prices, there will be NO price reduction for the cost of fuel or natural gas IN the US. Barry will support natural gas and oil production for sale to help pay for his ‘spending gone wild’ addiction. The US ‘oil and natural gas resources’ belong to the citizens of this country and are to be used by those same citizens! Speculators, manipulators and the banks continue to unfairly and unjustly make the driving public pay higher prices at the pump for their benefit.
Whatever the size or shape of the vehicle is, Produce and ‘Drive’ vehicles with high MPG, are very reliable, have a ‘reasonable’ cost and a good ‘value’ for the money.
The price of fuel at the pump is too high!
12/22/2012!
Profile Pic
TWS658
Champion Author Portland

Posts:3,521
Points:748,550
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 2:12:33 AM

Ok.
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:18,269
Points:1,875,420
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 1:56:17 AM

PDQBlues - "This pipeline is such a potential disaster that even the citizens and property owners of the midwest are against it. They know that contaminated water means death."

That and the fact that sending Canadian crude to Texas will increase the cost in the Midwest and increase fuel prices here.
Profile Pic
badspots
Champion Author Houston

Posts:1,563
Points:412,920
Joined:Feb 2011
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 12:11:23 AM

Ok.
Profile Pic
OGW
Champion Author London

Posts:3,752
Points:1,203,060
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 12:09:02 AM

Contractors often cut corners with any project and do not tell the company that hires them. It is money in their pockets. That is why government inspectors are suppose to do their job and report any problems. This does not mean that Trans Canada is at fault but those doing the inspections on the pipelines are responsible if they did not shut it down and order corrections.
Profile Pic
GoGoGoodyear
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:1,035
Points:309,190
Joined:Mar 2010
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 12:09:02 AM


I've been for the construction of this third phase of the Keystone pipeline since the beginning, however the more I read and investigate on my own the more doubt I have as to the value of this project to the American public.

Regardless if we believe the whistle blower inspector or not, the company which will own and operate the pipeline appears to have a poor track record with other similar pipelines and this is something that cannot be glossed over or explained away. Pipeline leaks are not "normal" and a well operated pipeline doesn't spring leaks like that. Compare with any number of other pipelines that criss cross the U.S. and see if those have had as many problems, even in harsh conditions such as in Alaska. We do not need another BP or Exxon Valdez on our hands, especially since the responsible parties seem to never pay for the full value of the damages they cause and rely instead on the taxpayers to pick up part of the tab. We already pay too much for gas and oil, should we also pay for an oil company's safety lapses?

Then there is the fact that the oil which will flow through this pipeline will apparently not benefit the American public since all of it will be sold to other countries and simply flow through the U.S. on it's way to other places. The only benefit may be from some tax or fee imposed on the oil which will go to the government.

The claim of the pipeline creating more jobs is coming into question now as well since some of the materials used in past pipelines owned by this same company have come from foreign suppliers. Even if the quality of the materials is as good as American made, are they helping to create jobs when they buy materials from foreign sources while local factories layoff their workers?
Profile Pic
jdc17327
Champion Author Pennsylvania

Posts:1,411
Points:142,970
Joined:May 2009
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 12:06:13 AM

okay
Profile Pic
bcok
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:1,553
Points:1,380,700
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 12:03:32 AM

What happened to safety? Having been able to u reach this -already trouble. Keep it away from any human population.
Profile Pic
tampacrvdriver
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:1,731
Points:362,350
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2012 12:01:03 AM

This changes my mind about it.
Profile Pic
SparkieMi
Champion Author Kalamazoo

Posts:1,473
Points:239,405
Joined:Sep 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:58:50 PM

Good post Martinman!!!
Profile Pic
DustyHorse
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:4,505
Points:1,075,470
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:58:27 PM

Interesting.
Profile Pic
njerald
Champion Author Seattle

Posts:6,019
Points:1,272,525
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:58:04 PM

What a crock!!!!
Profile Pic
Dodge_Me
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:1,116
Points:238,375
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:56:53 PM

Investigate anyway
Profile Pic
Wierbe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:2,012
Points:764,065
Joined:Apr 2006
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:56:19 PM

As usual, follow the money to find the problem.
Profile Pic
JesseJack52
All-Star Author Virginia Beach

Posts:612
Points:124,640
Joined:Sep 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:53:45 PM

Houston, we've got a Narc on board!
Profile Pic
tippybuddy
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:1,364
Points:183,735
Joined:Feb 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:50:08 PM

I agree with Carman ...
Profile Pic
tidalwave3
All-Star Author Tallahassee

Posts:586
Points:1,136,465
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:47:00 PM

he said , she said ????
Profile Pic
Beaveronparade
All-Star Author Hartford

Posts:984
Points:295,500
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:42:46 PM

Very interesting article. I'm all for the pipeline so I like to learn all I can about it.
Profile Pic
ysmc
Champion Author Providence

Posts:8,752
Points:1,693,710
Joined:Apr 2007
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:33:14 PM

propaganda
Profile Pic
feistyfella
All-Star Author Georgia

Posts:510
Points:116,845
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:31:34 PM

Klinky business.
Profile Pic
gj35
All-Star Author San Diego

Posts:683
Points:496,405
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:29:42 PM

With wind, solor, and electricity, why do we need oil?
Profile Pic
chuck sr
All-Star Author Tampa

Posts:598
Points:791,920
Joined:Apr 2004
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:27:00 PM

God Help Us!
Profile Pic
EVBuddy
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:14,879
Points:2,674,765
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:22:00 PM

It is so much easier not to have it.
Profile Pic
mstearno
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:6,376
Points:1,390,440
Joined:Jan 2008
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:19:31 PM

no union workers maybe it would be built better..?
Profile Pic
FlogNut
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:90,705
Points:1,649,225
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:14:49 PM

With all of this "shoddy" construction just where are all the leaks?
Profile Pic
Holly123
Champion Author Charlotte

Posts:1,615
Points:442,435
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:12:23 PM

It's unfortunate.
Profile Pic
bif65
All-Star Author Virginia

Posts:792
Points:138,075
Joined:Jan 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:07:30 PM

ok
Profile Pic
craigsfrank
Champion Author Arkansas

Posts:1,748
Points:570,745
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:06:29 PM

Let's see, this inspector a Democrat??? I'm thinking so....
Profile Pic
theschmuck
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:1,991
Points:1,224,310
Joined:Mar 2007
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:04:54 PM

Good article 'martinman', stops and makes you think a bit doesn't it.
Profile Pic
Lukus
Champion Author Halifax

Posts:6,545
Points:1,323,185
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:04:32 PM

So he says but where are the other engineers.
Profile Pic
freerobert
Champion Author California

Posts:1,044
Points:988,765
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:01:53 PM

They need to do it right the first time. Don't need substandard materinal for the pipeline.
Profile Pic
crowefamily1
All-Star Author Texas

Posts:797
Points:293,755
Joined:Sep 2006
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 11:00:33 PM

so says the liberal media.
Profile Pic
billy44bo
Champion Author Mobile

Posts:5,647
Points:1,146,545
Joined:Feb 2008
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:58:52 PM

With all the money that B P is paying for the junk in the gulf do you think this would had happen. This story reads like it came from nobama supporters.
Profile Pic
livedream
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:1,825
Points:397,270
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:56:04 PM

I agree with this comment from Lea from right after the article:

"Lea Matthews says:
January 5, 2012 at 10:36 am

I recently read an article that says we are exporting more oil than we are importing. So all the talk about there being such a shortage that we have to accept this pipeline, or drill in Gulf coast or Alaska are pure bunk. If we kept the oil here instead of exporting it and combined that with higher demands for cars MGP regulations it sound like to me we would be okay. Oil is finite, it will run out sooner or later so why don’t we make steps now to replace it with green energy solutions..."
Profile Pic
ratones1
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:1,604
Points:395,280
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:53:42 PM

HUM...
Profile Pic
gumbyrex
Champion Author Fresno

Posts:1,502
Points:400,470
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:53:10 PM

Interesting article. But is this just "sour grapes"?
Profile Pic
carman11
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:1,475
Points:331,645
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:53:06 PM

GIVE ME A BRAKE!!!!!! I am going outside to see if the sky is falling!!
Profile Pic
humblepie
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:17,405
Points:2,011,270
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:48:28 PM

the liberal media gives disgruntled ex-employees
a fancy name now. people trying to get even for
being fired or passed over for someone else...
Profile Pic
Yankee829
All-Star Author Dallas

Posts:534
Points:213,480
Joined:Sep 2010
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:48:02 PM

That's what happens when you try to rush things without paying attention to details. Stuff happens.
Profile Pic
PDQBlues
Champion Author San Diego

Posts:5,252
Points:1,088,225
Joined:Jan 2009
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:47:48 PM

This pipeline is such a potential disaster that even the citizens and property owners of the midwest are against it. They know that contaminated water means death.
Profile Pic
mrreferee
All-Star Author Savannah

Posts:652
Points:266,240
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:47:45 PM

make the pipeline to our specs, trans Can will have to bite the bullett
Profile Pic
sillywagon
Champion Author New York

Posts:11,739
Points:1,082,320
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:41:35 PM

These accusations are disturbing. I just wish this story was from a more credible site.

Would you not be skeptical if the American Petroleum Institutes website said that tar sands oil had little pollution? No you would question the credibility of the site.
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:12,522
Points:1,741,020
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:41:31 PM

zaq001 from atlanta forgot to read before he posted...

"LOL....what a load of garbage. Ask him about the Environmental Impact Assessment, the Security Assessment, and the numerous state level impact studies. Not to mention the numerous studies that occur before the pipeline actually goes into use. This is a complete farce."

.

Doh!

Personally, I think people should do their homework, before they engage in character assassinations.

Part of the Environmental Impact Statement analysis, requires a review of the potential for various mishaps over life of the pipeline, and their impacts. Part of that process includes a review of similar pipelines, as well as the company's previous operating history.

So with that in mind, guess what. The Keystone pipeline has a history!

The following information is taken directly from the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the Keystone XL pipeline, by Cardno Entrix of Australia. All reportable spills/leaks are included in this section, starting on page 3.13-11, Table 3.13.1-4. This EIS was compiled by a company hired by TransCanada, to "help assist" the State Department.

From the assessment of leaks along the U.S. portion of the Keystone pipeline that has been completed, here is the listing of reportable leaks/spills from this very same Keystone pipeline Mike Klink writes about, taken from the EIS report that was completed last year. During the first 12 months of operation, that segment of the Keystone pipeline within the U.S. had FOURTEEN (14) reportable spills at pump stations:

Keystone XL - Phase I (Canadian border to Steele City Nebraska, to Wood River Illinois, to Patoka Illinois)

21 May 10 – 5 gallons [Carpenter, SD](failure of a 1-1/2” below ground fitting connected to a mainline isolation valve)

Segment from Steele City to Wood River completed June 2010

23 Jun 10 - ~100 gallons [Howard, SD](leak occurred at PS site during maintenance from a small fitting attached to the sump pump)

10 Aug 10 - ~2 gallons [Freeman, SD](Failure of a 1” fitting attached to a pig trap receiver)

19 Aug 10 – 10 gallons [Hartington, NE](failure of a 1/2” above ground fitting.)

05 Jan 11 - <2 gallons [Andover, SD](leak occurred when a station pump seal bearing started seeping oil)

08 Jan 11 - <3 gallons [Doniphan County, KS](source of the leak was a seal (packing) on a 6” valve)

31 Jan 11 - <10 gallons [Turney, MO](source of the leak was a seal failure on Pump #2)

Keystone XL - Phase II (Steele City Nebraska, to Cushing Oklahoma)

completed February 2011

03 Feb 11 - <15 gallons [Cushing, OK](source of release was a temporary vent gas separator)

11 Feb 11 - <100 gallons [David City, NE](source of release was seal failure during maintenance activity on pump seal))

23 Feb 11 – 10 gallons [Udall, KS](source of the leak was a valve seal on a drain line of a pump suction line)

08 Mar 11 - <5 gallons [Brampton, ND](source of the leak was a pump unit bearing housing)

16 Mar 11 - 12 barrels [500+ gallons][Seneca, KS] (source of the leak was a pump seal failure)

07 May 11 – 500 barrels [21,000 gallons] [Brampton, ND](source of the leak was a 3/4" diameter pipe nipple failure)

Woo hoo! We have a “crowd pleaser” folks.

The NRC report states that 5 barrels were “sprayed off-site impacting neighboring properties [*plural*] to the south...”

29 May 11 - ~420 gallons [Doniphan County, KS] (source of the leak was a 1/2" nipple located on a pressure transmitter)

That was the last spill or leak reported at the time the EIS data were compiled.

A couple of disturbing trends emerged in reviewing these data.

1. ALL these spills occurred at - you guessed it - those very same pumping stations that Mike Klink blew the whistle on.

2. Over time, the spills have become larger.

3. Most of the larger spills were grossly under-reported, and then later “revised” by TransCanada when the spill was investigated.

4. One spill involved property outside of the pipeline easement, and several have required removal of contaminated soil/ground from the impacted areas.

5. The last two spills (21,000 gallons, 420 gallons) both occurred at pump stations that previously had spills (spills #6 & #14 at Doniphan County, KS; spills #11 & #13 at Brampton, ND). The 21,000 gallon spill at Brampton ND, occurred in less than 2 months after the first. The 420 gallon spill in Doniphan County KS, occurred 5 months after the first spill.

6. Witnesses of the 21,000 gallon leak, reported a “six-story geyser

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_dae7b66e-e0c5-5677-9acd-0773efb0d8d1.html

.

So, you tell me.

IS 14 spills in 12 months "acceptable" by any standard - on a pipeline that was [then] LESS THAN ONE YEAR OLD?

Furthermore, Gas Buddy member AuburnTim posted early this morning in this very article (reply now bumped off) that he personally knows Mike Klink who is also from Auburn Indiana, and has no reason to not believe what Mr. Klink has written.

.
Profile Pic
LegoVasavouchi
Champion Author Oklahoma

Posts:1,168
Points:79,940
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2012 10:40:19 PM

Fascinating.
Post a reply Back to Topics