inchgallo

Rookie Author
Manitoba
Posts:46 Points:11,220 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 2:24:02 PM
Sounds good to refine our own fuel but does that mean we will be able to buy gas at a producer nation price which is alot lower than what we pay now the world price, we need a break from the large company profits, from resources of the country
|
glorioussnookie

Champion Author
Tennessee
Posts:3,761 Points:699,370 Joined:Feb 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 2:13:38 PM
YaBassa you hit the nail on the head!!!!
|
majormarket

All-Star Author
Houston
Posts:829 Points:788,485 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 11:53:50 AM
Those darn Canadians - always resourceful and pragmatic.
Someone needs to stop these rogue elements. (Tongue firmly in cheek.)
|
fracknsave

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:1,666 Points:58,000 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 10:47:19 AM
It is black gold and it will eventually find a market whether you like it or not.
|
YaBassa

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:2,420 Points:515,150 Joined:Nov 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:33:12 AM
One of the problems of sending this dirty sand oil to the Gulf refineries was that the pipeline would go through the fragile Oglala Aquifer, but now they want to put a leaky pipeline through the Great Lakes water basin.
Big Oil doesn't care what it screws up as long as it makes money.
We can live without oil, but we cannot live without water.
|
Gas_Eyes

Champion Author
Dallas
Posts:2,667 Points:642,910 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:17:44 AM
The $64,000 question for Canada's refineries in the East is whether they can process the heavier and sour crude from the dirty tar sands when they are more geared toward lighter and sweeter Brent Crude that they normally import.
|
db60

All-Star Author
Indiana
Posts:982 Points:211,255 Joined:Oct 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 9:16:48 AM
Whatever.
|
Track79

All-Star Author
Maine
Posts:802 Points:599,265 Joined:Mar 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 8:42:01 AM
Sure
|
dave27johnson

Champion Author
Chicago
Posts:1,787 Points:406,700 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 8:27:32 AM
Let's build the infrastructure to extract, move and refine oil and gas throughout North America.
|
orphancarguyPE

Champion Author
PEI
Posts:3,837 Points:733,040 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 8:13:09 AM
Beside, Canadians would be much better customers for Canadian oil than Americans have turned out to be. We would gladly pay say $110 a barrel for it, rather than importing it from the mideast or Venezuela at say $120-125 a barrel as is the case now. It even more galling that the US is stiffing Canada to the tune of only paying $75.00 a barrel for Canadian crude, really a giveaway price--and a massive subsidy of the US economy by Canadians.
|
Evilmaddog

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:3,312 Points:955,600 Joined:Aug 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 8:10:09 AM
Couldn't hurt
|
LilRedWagonIN

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:7,766 Points:1,552,435 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 8:02:38 AM
South? No. West? No. East? Not decided yet, but probably no. So, anyone want to suggest North?
|
orphancarguyPE

Champion Author
PEI
Posts:3,837 Points:733,040 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 8:02:00 AM
No, CHINA is west for Alberta crude, and that is being considered as well. The pipelines EAST would be to supply eastern Canada refineries in Ontario, Quebec, and possibly Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland.
|
bullet226

Champion Author
Toronto
Posts:2,716 Points:534,915 Joined:Nov 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 7:44:08 AM
East, as in CHINA!
|
VDubBill

Champion Author
Jacksonville
Posts:3,765 Points:1,260,870 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 7:43:48 AM
If they're going that way couldn't they use the Great Lakes as part of the line?
|
dr047

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:2,581 Points:515,495 Joined:Aug 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 6:10:28 AM
Will it it lower gas prices for Canadians? Doubt it!
Sounds like a ploy to put pressure back on the U.S.
|
nfldude

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:3,857 Points:443,855 Joined:Dec 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 3:22:10 AM
git er dun...
|
abacus44

Champion Author
Toms River
Posts:3,470 Points:745,790 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 2:51:54 AM
"This was an interesting article. I am still confused as to why oil must be transported such long distances. Would it not be possible to construct environmentally secure refineries in the largest urban area near the oil field and refine gasoline there? "
Then they can ship the more volitile refined products through a pipeline. Brilliant!
|
Doro

Rookie Author
Nebraska
Posts:57 Points:5,310 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 2:11:45 AM
This was an interesting article. I am still confused as to why oil must be transported such long distances. Would it not be possible to construct environmentally secure refineries in the largest urban area near the oil field and refine gasoline there?
|
MN1

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:3,349 Points:648,640 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 1:51:35 AM
Good for CN.
|
DandyDapple

All-Star Author
North Dakota
Posts:715 Points:309,320 Joined:Sep 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 1:38:58 AM
And BO has the railroads in his pockets ...
|
anascom

Champion Author
Hamilton
Posts:1,593 Points:553,115 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 1:10:23 AM
better late than never!
|
paisho6

Veteran Author
Oakland
Posts:294 Points:37,530 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 1:03:36 AM
ok
|
jimgraham

Champion Author
Akron
Posts:10,362 Points:1,977,260 Joined:Oct 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 12:49:02 AM
Just what I have been saying for the last 8 months or so.
Idiots...
|
MontanaMac

Champion Author
Washington
Posts:1,736 Points:410,050 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 12:12:02 AM
Better than routing west to China....
|
1momsunshine

Champion Author
Ottawa
Posts:5,480 Points:998,630 Joined:Mar 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 12:03:35 AM
ok
|
JohnofGB

Champion Author
Flint
Posts:5,411 Points:1,094,245 Joined:Feb 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 12:03:24 AM
Beats using railroad tank cars. And its a lot safer.
|
SammyAdams

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:3,043 Points:790,775 Joined:Nov 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 29, 2012 12:01:25 AM
To: NHLiveFree Re: Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 8:51:04 PM (Printed below)
"No humble, TransCanada and Royal Dutch Shell really "stiffed" Eastern Canada by not starting with this approach and design first. We all know they only desire to get their crude to the highest bidder in China by any and all means possible. God forbid that they create a "surplus" of oil and gasoline in Canada. That could potentially lower the exorbitant gasoline and diesel prices that Canadians now pay!!!" ====================================================================
If TransCanada was desiring to " . . . get their crude to the highest bidder . . ", then they would be doing what most every business was trying to do for their investors. U.S. companies export much of their crude oil and refined products overseas, because it commands a higher price. To infer that getting the most money for their products in some sort of aberration is misleading. And there is nothing wrong with this objective.
To get their crude to the Gulf of Mexico was TransCanada's first strategy; no doubt encouraged by our Department of State. But after 3 years of jumping through all the necessary hoops with a "thumbs up" by our State Department and to eventually have it nixed by BO who didn't have this as part of his political agenda, what are they supposed to do?
They are pursuing the development of the Keystone XL in two segments and examining all other options, as well. As a country we are very fortunate to be in a position to assist them with this pipeline. Canada is already our biggest trading partner and having the pipeline traverse our land is an added benefit because of the American jobs that it will generate and give a measure of security for both TransCanada and US.
|
Beaveronparade

Champion Author
Hartford
Posts:2,099 Points:633,180 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 11:58:35 PM
I say the pipelines are a great idea.
|
36_ACRES_4_SALE

All-Star Author
Appleton
Posts:999 Points:338,815 Joined:Oct 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 10:50:28 PM
good
|
mrbee

Champion Author
Little Rock
Posts:3,744 Points:2,464,030 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 10:43:52 PM
Good news
|
EricBrazil

Champion Author
Miami
Posts:2,127 Points:470,525 Joined:Nov 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 10:43:08 PM
Ok
|
gazprize

Veteran Author
Toronto
Posts:483 Points:125,120 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 9:58:56 PM
ok
|
doeslayersr

Champion Author
Illinois
Posts:9,098 Points:870,055 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 9:55:32 PM
Sounds like a good plan to me.
|
NHLiveFree

Champion Author
New Hampshire
Posts:11,076 Points:1,620,255 Joined:Jun 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 8:51:04 PM
No humble, TransCanada and Royal Dutch Shell really "stiffed" Eastern Canada by not starting with this approach and design first. We all know they only desire to get their crude to the highest bidder in China by any and all means possible. God forbid that they create a "surplus" of oil and gasoline in Canada. That could potentially lower the exorbitant gasoline and diesel prices that Canadians now pay!!!
|
aquarinut

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:1,628 Points:436,005 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 8:48:39 PM
Reducing reliance on higher priced offshore oil for lower priced domestic oil is always a good idea.
It would stimulate domestic growth, reduce offshore dependency and affords the ability to explore cleaner extraction and the higher development of alternative energy... providing its done properly!
Who knows, the oilsands may be the economic upswing required to allow Canada to become an extremely green friendly country without bankrupting the nation!!
|
humblepie

Champion Author
Toledo
Posts:34,128 Points:2,369,420 Joined:Mar 2006
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 8:29:25 PM
i hope canada makes it happen, obama really stiffed them, just like all our allies...abo 2012
|
Road-Runner

Champion Author
Denver
Posts:7,046 Points:1,905,165 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 8:25:31 PM
Sounds like a smart move, especially if the pipeline stays in Canada where it is not subject to Obama's veto.
|
VomVom

Champion Author
Calgary
Posts:3,857 Points:1,627,080 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 8:06:53 PM
Pipeline to any market is welcome.
|